Quantcast
Channel: CCIE Blog | iPexpert
Viewing all 338 articles
Browse latest View live

Router IP Traffic Export

$
0
0

Router IP Traffic Export (RITE), or simply IP Traffic Export, is a method of copying traffic directly from a router to an external device, such as a Protocol Analyzer or an Intrusion Detection System (IDS). This feature can be used to replace SPAN/RSPAN configurations deployed on L2 ports/VLANs. Two main benefits of RITE is, first, the ability to duplicate the traffic received on a WAN interface, such as Serial port, and second, granularity of our configuration – we can be very selective in what traffic will finally get copied from the network.

Before we discuss the configuration of RITE, just few words about limitations of this feature :

  1. The device receiving the exported traffic must be in the same L2 network as the router’s interface (e.g. must be directly connected). This interface is known as “outgoing” in the RITE’s terminology
  2. This (outgoing) interface must be an Ethernet port. Incoming interface(s) (where the traffic is received and optionally sent through) can be anything (e.g. WAN/LAN)
  3. Traffic generated by the router configured for RITE cannot be exported

A sample topology for RITE may look like one below. Our monitoring station (PC) is directly connected to R2’s RITE outgoing interface, Gig0/0 :

sec-post-1

Now when we know what RITE can do for us, let’s take a look at a configuration example. I will be using the topology above as a reference.

The configuration of IP Traffic Export is very straightforward – it is all about creating a Profile and applying it to a monitored interface. In our case, we will configure two different profiles to show you how certain settings affect the traffic which is copied.

Let’s say that our first goal is to copy the traffic sent from or destined to R5. We can easily accomplish that by configuring a RITE Profile and applying it to interface S0/2/0 (so this will be our “incoming” interface) :

sec-post-2code

By default only traffic incoming to the port gets copied (don’t confuse this with an “incoming interface”, which is what we monitor). This is why I specified the “bidirectional” option – it causes the router to export both, incoming and outgoing traffic on the monitored interface. Next step was to specify what is our “outgoing” interface (“interface”) – again, one through which the copied packets will be sent. This is obviously G0/0, the port connected to our PC (with Network Analyzer turned on), which MAC address is 000c.2905.c1c6 (“mac-address”). Finally I activated the Profile by applying it to the incoming interface, S0/2/0.

Let’s test this configuration :

sec-post-3code

Here are the results (Telnet, then ICMP) :

sec-post-4code

Note that not only the traffic from R5 was exported, but also replies from R2 – it is because we configured the “bidirectional” keyword in the Profile.

Next, let’s say we are only interested in traffic coming TO the G0/1 port – we only want to copy the traffic coming from R2. In addition, we will say we only want to copy ICMP packets, just one every 2 (50% of the traffic received on the port). Here’s how we can do that :

sec-post-5code

OK, what changes here? We did not use the “bidirectional” keyword, so we are only looking at the incoming packets. The “incoming access-list” command was used to tell the router what do we want to copy (specifically the ACL referenced in this command), and “incoming sample one-in-every” says how many packets we want to export (one in two here).

The results :
sec-post-6code

In addition, we are sending just four ICMP Echos :

sec-post-7code

We see only two packets got copied, as expected, and no replies were received :

sec-post-8code


iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 8/1/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Victor Yin, CCIE #49618 (Collaboration)
  • Christopher Bacon, CCIE #49617 (Route/Switch)
  • Majed Al-Logman, CCIE #49639 (Wireless)

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 8/7/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Jaffar Nassiry, CCIE #49339 (Wireless)
  • John Meachum, CCIE #49353 (Wireless)
  • James Wheat, CCIE #49400 (Wireless)
  • Brian McPhail, CCIE #49246 (Route/Switch)
  • Abdelfattah Ali, CCIE #48195 (Route/Switch)
  • Daniel Lucas, CCIE #49361 (Route/Switch)
  • Ding So, CCIE #40685 (Wireless)
  • Leonardo Henrique, CCIE #49208 (Collaboration)
  • Thomas Bryant, CCIE #49458 (Collaboration)
  • Ramcharan Arya, CCIE #28926 (Data Center)
  • Muhammad Adil, CCIE #49504 (Data Center)

This Week’s Testimonials

Ramcharan Arya CCIE #28926 (Voice/R&S/DC)
I would like to say “Thank you”, I have passed CCIE Data Center Lab exam last week. Your training material is outstanding for beginners to become an expert in DC technology. Your workbook and proctor lab racks helps in gaining hands-on experience and prepare for lab exam.

Thomas Bryant CCIE #49458 (Collaboration)
Studying for the Collaboration Lab takes years of experience among actual lab study. As most voice focused engineers know, time is extremely precious and dedicating study time is not exactly easy. I took the 10 day boot camp near Chicago to solidify my knowledge and ensure I knew all of the technologies on the blueprint backwards and forwards before my attempt. I can safely say that it was the best 10 days I have ever spent studying during my preparation for the lab. Andy definitely knows the technology and has great method of conveying that knowledge to students, the videos and on site instruction were extremely helpful in filling in some of the gaps on areas most voice engineers do not implement on a daily basis.  Couple that with the tons of practice lab material and any focused engineer will have great success in the lab. 

Daniel Lucas CCIE #49361 (Routing and Switching)
I literally could not passed without the materials, and knowledge from the instructors at iPexpert. I contribute a large part of my success to the many hours the instructors have spent in creating, and ensuring the workbooks are able to prepare students for the lab.

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

Purdue Research Park tenant offers Cisco certification prep classes

$
0
0

MERRILLVILLE, Ind. – Networking engineers in all industrial sectors who are preparing to take the Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert (CCIE) exam may benefit from a Purdue Research Park tenant that offers products and monthly preparation courses.

iPexpert Inc. is a tenant in the Purdue Research Park of Northwest Indiana that helps its clients prepare to take the CCIE Collaboration certification exam. Andy Vassar, senior technical instructor, said the prep courses are suitable for all networking professionals.

“Today, almost every company will have a networking engineer design and implement computer networks, and almost everyone runs Cisco Systems equipment in their network,” he said. “A CCIE certification is the most respected, sought-after certification in networking and there are many opportunities to use it. Those who earn it are considered the top experts in their profession.”

CCIE certification is available on several subjects including Routing and Switching, Data Center, Wireless and Security. Vassar said iPexpert classes at the Purdue Research Park of Northwest Indiana prepare attendees for the CCIE Collaboration certification, which covers communication via telephone, instant messenger and video.

“CCIE certification exams have two parts: passing the two-hour written test makes you eligible to take the eight-hour lab exam,” he said. “We offer two classes per month, including the lecture-driven Lab Preparation Boot Camp that covers the technology on a topic-by-topic basis. The following week is the One-Week Lab Experience during which an attendee has the opportunity to take two full-scale eight-hour mock lab exams. The Lab Experience class provides them a good perspective of what the real lab will be like.”

Vassar said most students take the two classes in tandem, one week following the other.

“The next class sessions are Aug. 10 for the Lab Preparation Boot Camp and Aug. 17 through 21 for the One-Week Lab Experience,” he said. “Next month the courses are Sept. 14 and Sept. 21-25. People can buy admission to the class through the online checkout system at www.ipexpert.com or by calling training advisers at 810-326-1444.”

Vassar said iPexpert’s sole focus is to help attendees prepare for CCIE certification exams.

“All of our instructors are on the same page, aiming for the same goal: we want attendees to pass these exams,” he said. “In addition to the courses that the instructors teach, iPexpert has created workbooks and video on demand solutions so that attendees can pass the lab exam strictly on their own documentation.”

About iPexpert Inc.

Launched in 2001, iPexpert Inc. is a 3-time Inc. 5000 honoree, as well as a 3-time Corp! award winner. We are committed to the highest quality training, and are passionate about our clients’ satisfaction and success. Our goal is to ensure the complete satisfaction of each of our customers. We have helped more than 4,300 CCIEs achieve their own success. We are only as successful as you are.

Purdue Research Park contact: Steve Martin, 765-588-3342, sgmartin@prf.org

Source: Andy Vassar, 219-776-4015, avassar@ipexpert.com

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 8/17/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Alemneh Nigussi, CCIE #28272 (Data Center)
    (He’s a 3x CCIE! He also has Voice and Routing/Switching.)
  • K.G. Pramod, CCIE #49662 (Data Center)
  • Mohamed Ahmed Ali, CCIE #34760 (Security)
  • Muhammad Adil, CCIE #49605 (Data Center)

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

Announcing Some Exciting Updates to Our Data Center, Routing & Switching, and Collaboration Materials!

$
0
0

CCIE Candidates! We’re excited to announce a few updates to our CCIE Data Center, R&S, and Collaboration product portfolios!

Data Center:

1) Our Volume 1 WB (and DSG) has been overhauled. Jason now has all labs that can be done on our Technology Racks covered in this book. It’s very thorough and covers everything you’ll see on the lab from a technology basis.

2) Our Volume 2 WB (and DSG) has had a MAJOR overhaul. Quite a few updates, changes and we’re happy that all 5 labs are very up-to-date. This workbook consists of 5 Mock Labs that must be done on our Full-Scale Mock Lab Racks – which have been booked solid for several months.

3) We have just finished the addition of 5 more Full-Scale Mock Lab racks! First, they’ve cost us a fortune, but our commitment to you is to have the resources you need to prepare for your lab. There are timeslots ready and open NOW if you need time on these Full-Scale Mock Lab racks.

Routing & Switching:

1) JP has finalized an updated R&S V5 Volume 1 WB (and DSG), and it’s posted and available now.

2) We anticipate having our R&S V5 Volume 2 WB (and DSG) up within the next few days. We will announce when it’s been uploaded.

Collaboration:

1) Andy has been busy, and made some updates to our CCIE Collaboration Volume 1 WB (and DSG), and it’s posted now and available for your download.

2) He’s also wrapped up all final touches on our CCIE Collaboration Volume 2 WB (and DSG) and that’s also ready for immediate download.

It’s also important to mention that if you’re not an iPeverything™ subscriber with access to these materials, you can find track-specific bundles here.

If you need assistance locating these products or would like additional details, please feel free to reach out to a Training Advisor at sales@ipexpert.com or via the live chat applet on our website.

Stay tuned for more updates as we continue to add to our portfolio in the coming weeks and months!

Codec Negotiations

$
0
0

Codec negotiation is a topic that gets glossed over without much consideration in the studies of most students. There’s really not much to it, right? All we have to do is slap a couple of Regions on two different system endpoints and…voila, we have successfully negotiated a codec! Can it be that simple? Like most answers to rhetorical questions in the tech world, “It depends.” A simplistic approach like the one just described above is a great place to start, but it doesn’t take into account key call flow elements such as early/delayed offer, Audio Codec Preference Lists, or call routing across CUBE, CUCM or CUCME. What if the codec should be different based on the originator of the call? These are all examples of key issues involving codec negotiation that we must wrap our mind around if we are to be successful in our CCIE Collaboration endeavors.

Let’s examine the requirement of routing a call between a 9971 Phone registered to the HQ CUCM cluster (HQ Phone 1) and a 7965 Phone registered to the SB CUCM cluster (SB Phone 1). In this example, consider that a SIP Trunk is configured directly between clusters in order to route calls to each phone. Also, assume that Regions are created for the HQ phone (HQ_PHONE_REG), the SIP trunk at HQ (HQ_SIP_REG), the SIP trunk at SB (SB_SIP_REG), and the SB phone (SB_PHONE_REG).

Codec-0001

For the first exercise, let’s configure the call flow to use the G.729 codec. In this example, assume that the Region relationship between HQ_PHONE_REG and SB_SIP_REG must be set to 64 kbps (G.722, G.711). Assume the same between SB_PHONE_REG and SB_SIP_REG.

Codec-0002

Codec-0003

In this configuration, the only possible way to force the negotiation of the G.729 codec is to use an Audio Codec Preference List. This list allows us to prioritize the available codecs that will be used for negotiation. In order of priority, the possible codecs that have the ability to negotiate between the 9971 and 7965 phones using 64 kbps of bandwidth are G.722, G.711, iLBC, and G.729. This means that we must move G.729 ahead of all other options in order to successfully select that codec. The screenshot below lists the possible preferred codecs at the top of the list for brevity.

Codec-0004

We must now simply assign the newly created Audio Codec Preference List to the existing Region Relationship and we are in business!

Codec-0005

Codec-0006

A quick test call between phones proves that the negotiation is successful.

Codec-0007

Codec-0008

We configured it correctly, which is great news, but how does it really work? Well, since we are signaling over a SIP trunk, which uses Delayed Offer (DO) by default, the media capabilities negotiation started with the HQ CUCM cluster’s reception of the “200 OK” message (containing the SDP) from the SB CUCM cluster. As you can see below, the G.729 codec is given first priority, but other codecs are still available for negotiation.

Codec-0009

It’s not until the HQ CUCM cluster sends the “ACK” message to select its first priority codec that the negotiation process is complete and the G.729 codec is agreed upon.

Codec-0010

How does this same call flow behave for an Early Offer (EO) call? To test it out, we must configure a SIP Profile on both the HQ and SB CUCM clusters to enable the “Early Offer support for voice and video calls (insert MTP if needed)” setting and assign it to the existing SIP trunk.

Codec-0011

Codec-0012

After another test call between HQ Phone 1 and SB Phone 1, we can see that the audio codec is still using G.729, as expected. This time, the initial “INVITE” message from the HQ CUCM cluster contains the SDP in order to negotiate the codecs ahead of time. Notice once again that G.729 is atop the list of available codecs.

Codec-0013

This time, the “200 OK” message from SB is all that is needed to determine the codec for the session. Since it also prefers G.729, the codec is negotiated as such.

Codec-0014

Next, let’s consider a scenario where we would like to negotiate the G.729 codec for calls from HQ Phone 1 to SB Phone 1, just as before. However, for calls in the reverse direction, we should utilize the iLBC codec. In this case, we really have to think about how codec negotiation works to understand the configuration. As we have observed, the originator of an EO call sends a prioritized list of supported codecs (G.729, G.722, G.711, and iLBC) in the “INVITE” message. The receiver responds (“200 OK”) with whatever codec is highest on its own prioritized list, as long as it is supported by the originating endpoint. The same is true for DO calls, except in the opposite direction. The receiver sends the initial prioritized list (“200 OK”), while the originator selects the desired codec based on its own priority (“ACK”). In both of the above cases, the first priority codecs were the same (G.729). But what happens if they are different?

Consider the case where the SB CUCM cluster has updated the Region relationship between the SB_PHONE_REG and SB_SIP_REG to prefer the iLBC codec using an Audio Codec Preference List, as shown below.

Codec-0015

Codec-0016

In this case, for EO calls originating from HQ, the audio codec is negotiated as iLBC. As you can see from the SDP in the initial “INVITE” message, the G.729 codec is still the preferred codec for the HQ CUCM cluster.

Codec-0017

However, the codec is actually selected based on the preferences of the SB CUCM cluster, since it has the benefit of selecting from the available codecs in the list.

Codec-0018

In the opposite direction, with the EO call originating from SB, the G.729 codec is negotiated. Due to the Audio Codec Preference List, the SB CUCM cluster prefers the iLBC codec as per the initial “INVITE”.

Codec-0019

However, the HQ CUCM cluster selects the G.729 codec due to its locally configured preferences.

Codec-0020

For DO calls, the exact opposite happens. Calls originating from HQ use the G.729 codec, due to the response in the “ACK” message, and calls originating from SB use the iLBC codec for the same reason.

The last behavior that I’d like to discuss is simply configuring the system to accept the codec preferences of any received offers, regardless of whether that offer comes in an “INVITE”, “200 OK”, or “ACK” message. The setting is called “Accept Audio Codec Preferences in Received Offer” and can be configured within a SIP Profile and assigned to a SIP trunk.

Codec-0021

If enabled on both CUCM clusters, for a DO call, this essentially puts the onus on the remote end to select the desired codec. For EO calls, the originator decides what codec should be used. In this example, calls from HQ Phone 1 to SB Phone 1 now use the iLBC codec while calls from SB Phone 1 to HQ Phone 1 use the G.729 codec.

I hope this blog was helpful for you in your CCIE Collaboration preparation. As always, give us a call and speak with a training adviser if you’re interested in purchasing our workbooks, attending a class, or have any questions regarding your preparation. Thanks again for reading and good luck in your preparation!

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 8/28/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Mohan Mayilraj, CCIE #49942 (Data Center)
  • Zahari Georgiev, CCIE #49996 (Wireless)
  • Mohamed Enassiri, CCIE #46237 (Collaboration)

This Week’s Testimonial

Mohan Mayilraj CCIE #49942 (Data Center)
Thank you very much for help reach my goal. Your video and training and Boot camp helped lot and your proctor lab is gem and very much useful and I used your lab most of time and workbook.This is my first attempt on CCIE. I got through it .

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!


MPBGP Configuration

$
0
0

Hi everyone, JP here. You know as CCIE candidates, we are faced with one of the most difficult, and grueling, exams the networking world has to offer – the CCIE lab exam. As you may or may not be aware, Frame-Relay was replaced with L3VPN and DMVPN in the R&S Version 5 blueprint update. This means not only will we need to understand our IGP’s, MPLS, and VRF Lite, but we will need to fully understand how to configure MPBGP in order to transport our VPN labels and prefixes across the service provider’s network.

Using a topology from one of our mock labs, let’s have a look into the configuration of MP-BGP and make sure we understand it. Preview the diagram in HD here.

JP_Blog_082015_1

In a Layer 3 VPN we are driven by the need to advertise customer prefixes across a service provider network, while keeping these customers isolated from one another. To do this using L3VPN, we need to carry more than just the IPv4 unicast address, which is all standard BGP is capable of. Additional information like the MPLS label, VPN label, and route-distinguisher need to be carried from one point of the network to the other. Let’s imagine for a second that we have 2 customers. In our above diagram they are Brand Office 1 and Acquisition 2. Let’s say that both of these customers use the 10.10.1.0/24 address space. How do we distinguish between these 2 different customers when these routes arrive on our PE? The route-distinguisher is the answer to that question.

The RD is an extended BGP community that creates a unique address by prepending a unique 8-octet field to our existing 4-octet IP address. This new 8-byte field will consist of a 2-byte type field followed by a 6-byte value field. For example, our 10.10.1.0/24 network might become 150:150:10.10.1.0 for the Branch Office, while Acquisition 2 might become 250:250:10.10.1.0. Now, when both customer routes reach our PE, while they are using same IPv4 address space, the addresses are globally unique per customer. It is important to understand that the RD is only used to make our addresses unique; it does not control any route redistribution. For this, we need what is known as the RT or Route-Target. The RT is used to identify which prefixes we want to import into our VRF. When we create a VRF we are going to give it two values. The RT-Import is going to look for any inbound prefixes with that route-target and then install them into our BGP VRF. The RT-Export is going to use this value for any prefix leaving our BGP VRF. The MPBGP VPN is then going to carry these prefixes and values from one PE to the other. Let’s just have a look.

JP_Blog_082015_2

So we have created a VRF using the values above. We are going to receive any VRF prefixes that were exported with the value of 150:150. Likewise, we are going to send our prefixes with a value of 150:150. Now how do we assign and carry customer routes across a provider network with this new information added to the IP header? Classic BGP only supports standard IPv4 unicast addresses, so there is no way it can handle this new 150:150:10.10.1.0/24 prefix, because it is no longer a IPv4 prefix. If we tried to use BGP it just wouldn’t work because it would ignore the additional bytes. This is where MP-BGP, or Multi-Protocol BGP comes in. MP-BGP gives us the ability to carry multiple different types of addresses simultaneously through what are called address-families. In this case we are interested specifically in the VPNv4 address-family, as well as the IPv4 VRF address-family. These new address-families between our PE routers are going to carry and assign information, such as the RD, that we need to make this work. Keep in mind that in addition to our RD and RT we are going to have our transport label, used to reach the next PE router, and the VPN label which will tell the PE which customer, or CE, the routes belong to.

Now just a quick note here. Our network is already setup with LDP peering’s between all our required P and PE routers, so we aren’t going to address the MPLS requirements. Our customer devices are already setup with BGP facing our PE with redistribution so we aren’t going to need to take care of anything there, but let’s have a look at that configuration.

JP_Blog_082015_3

R11 has a standard BGP configuration and mutual redistribution with OSPF. OSPF is being used as our IGP facing into our network. BGP is the EGP being used to advertise our prefixes out to our PE. That is the reason for the mutual redistribution. As we receive routes from our PE we need to inject them into OSPF, likewise as we receive OSPF prefixes from our internal neighbors, we need to inject them in BGP. Notice when we redistribute from OSPF into BGP we make sure to match type 1 and type 2 prefixes. By default, BGP is only going to redistribute intra area routes from OSPF. This is why we need to make it a habit of ensuring we match all types.

As we go through this configuration it is important to note that we only perform these steps on the PE routers. The rest of the provider cloud does not get any of this special treatment. Now, by default BGP will automatically enable the transport of IPv4 unicast addresses. When dealing with L3VPN and MPBGP I recommended that we disable this to give ourselves a little bit more control of IPv4 peering’s to avoid problems. Let’s go ahead and configure standard BGP with ipv4 unicast disabled.

JP_Blog_082015_4

JP_Blog_082015_5

At this point we have our standard BGP configured, but we have no peering’s established. This is due to the fact that we have disabled the default ipv4-unicast setting within BGP. We need to tell BGP how we want it to peer with the neighbor we have configured. So now we jump into creating our first address-family. If we issue the address-family command followed by the “?” we can see our available options:

JP_Blog_082015_6

For this particular piece of our configuration we are going to need the IPv4 option. As we create our address-family, I usually make it a habit of adding the send-community extended command. This is habit for me and is going to allow me to send any extended community values I want to send later on down the road. It is not required for this particular implementation.

JP_Blog_082015_7

JP_Blog_082015_8

Good, we have our IPv4 unicast peering up and running. Now take a note that we are peering with the loopback addresses. We already have full reachability due to OSPF being configured in our provider cloud for LDP. Up to this point we have not done anything out of the ordinary of what we do in a standard BGP configuration, except for the creation of the address-family to support ipv4 unicast traffic. Any BGP peer not participating in this PE-to-PE VPN will now be configured under this ipv4 address-family. Peers that are configured under this address family will have prefixes added to the global routing table. For example, if we created a loopback interface and R2 and advertised it into BGP we would see it in the global routing table of ISP3. Let’s have a look at that.

JP_Blog_082015_9

JP_Blog_082015_10

As we expected, we see this 2.2.2.2/32 route in our global routing table on ISP3. So everything is working perfect up to this point.

Our next step is to create the VPNv4 address-family for the use of carrying our customer prefixes across the network to the other PE. We do this the same way we created our last address-family except we use the VPNv4 key word instead of IPv4. Just as with our IPv4 address family, we need to activate our neighbor. Notice the additional send-community extended command. This option enables us to send the extended communities to our neighbor. If this option is not added to our configuration we will not have the capability to carry the attributes we discussed earlier when configuring our VRF.

JP_Blog_082015_11

JP_Blog_082015_12

Once we enable our VPNv4 address family our standard peering is reset. BGP tells us it is because the capabilities have changed. Nothing to be alarmed about, this is completely normal. The one thing we need to be aware of however is that it will reset our peering. If we do this in a production environment we might want to do it off hours, even though it’s only for a brief moment. I want to take a moment to introduce you to a new command that we are going to need to be aware of. We now have 2 different types of BGP peering’s between our PE routers. We have our standard IPv4 unicast peering and our VPNv4 peering. Let’s verify that both are up and running, and take a mental note to the different commands required to perform this action.

IPv4 Unicast Peering:

JP_Blog_082015_13

VPNv4 Unicast Peering:

JP_Blog_082015_14

Lastly we need to configure our VRF address-family with our CE routers. This is how our PE routers will actually receive the internal prefixes from the customer. Remember that our VRF has already been configured and placed on the proper interfaces. We already have LDP configured and have our peering’s. For example, have a look at our configuration on ISP3:

JP_Blog_082015_15

JP_Blog_082015_16

Once we configure this VRF address family, our MP-BGP is going to come together with our MPLS and give us some magic. We have already applied our VRF’s to the appropriate interfaces using the ip vrf forwarding command. As shown above we have our LDP neighbors. In theory, this is all we should need to do in order to route between our 2 offices over our MPLS VPN.

JP_Blog_082015_17

JP_Blog_082015_18

As soon as we activate our PE neighbor we instantly see our peering come up for the VRF iPexpert. Now remember the nature of a VRF. At this point our PE routers now have 2 routing tables, as well as 2 BGP tables. One is global to the PE, as seen below. Notice we have no prefixes to our customers.

JP_Blog_082015_19

JP_Blog_082015_20

Now if we look at our L3VPN output, we are going to see something much different.

We start out by issuing the same ip route command we would always use however, now we append what vrf RIB we want to view.

JP_Blog_082015_21

Ok, we are receiving our prefixes from the other PE and they are being installed into our vrf RIB for iPexpert. Notice we have the 172.16.70.0 prefixes and we also have the 172.16.8.8/32 prefix, which is the loopback 0 interface of R8 in our Acquisition office. Now let’s move into taking a look at our BGP table for our VPN.

JP_Blog_082015_22

Here we can see all of our prefixes coming into the PE from both directions. We see our 172.16.60.0 prefixes coming from our Branch Office. Remember this is being redistributed from OSPF running as the IGP in the office. We also see the prefixes coming from the other PE, which is R2. BGP even is nice enough to tell us what our RD is, before giving us any of our networks.

Finally, let’s verify our reachability and make sure that we did our job properly. When it comes time to take the lab, verification is going to be something that makes you or breaks you. We absolutely must verify that we have done our job correctly.

JP_Blog_082015_23

From our R13 customer device inside of our Branch Office, we are able to successfully reach the loopback 0 interface of R8, which is the CE router in the Acquisition 2 office. This is exactly what we expected.

I hope you enjoyed reading, keep studying!

J.P. Cedeno
Routing & Switching Instructor

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 9/04/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Eric Williamson, CCIE #49880 (Collaboration)
  • Paul Raffles, CCIE #49941 (Data Center)
  • Fabien Roulette, CCIE #49854 (Collaboration)

This Week’s Testimonial

Eric Williamson CCIE #49880 (Collaboration)
I would absolutely recommend IPexpert and Andy Vassar for CCIE Collaboration training. One of my favorite parts of the new blueprint change was that the rack rentals went to four hours and the labs increased but they were able to be done in smaller sections. As a person who travels on the road almost every week it was important to have a phone control/view option when coming in on a software VPN. This helped me to keep on track. Thank you Andy for helping me in so many instances, I will be eternally grateful.

Fabien Roulette CCIE #49854 (Collaboration)
Thank you very much for the quality of your books and pods on proctorlabs

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 9/11/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Hesham Abdelkereem, CCIE #40790 (Dual, Wireless & Collaboration)
  • Nadeem Akbar, CCIE #11610 (Wireless)
  • Hugo Dantas, CCIE #49174 (Collaboration)

This Week’s Testimonial

Hesham Abdelkereem CCIE #40790 (Wireless & Collaboration)
The product that helped me was Video on Demand.

Nadeem Akbar CCIE #411610 (Wireless)
The CCIE Wireless Bootcamp helped me pass the exam.

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 9/18/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Ajay Edara, CCIE #36424 (R&S & Wireless)
  • Shiv Shankar, CCIE #43675 (Routing & Switching)
  • Andy Harrison, CCIE #50052 (Routing & Switching)
  • Mike Burk, CCIE #50207 (Wireless)
  • Tony Ilorah, CCIE #50210 (Security)
  • Ahmad Nawid Azizi, CCIE #50254 (Routing & Switching)

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 10/2/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Naveed Nawazish, CCIE #43563 (Service Provider)
  • Zach Georgiev, CCIE #49996 (Wireless)
  • Dennis Flemmig, CCIE #50255 (Routing & Switching)
  • Maya Antony, CCIE #50351 (Collaboration)
  • Austin Peacock, CCIE #50453 (Data Center)

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 10/10/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Terry Girard, CCIE #50463 (Security)
  • David Segura, CCIE #40994 (Voice)

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 10/16/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Michael Schwartzman, CCIE #50447 (Data Center)
  • Robert Kim, CCIE #50574 (Routing & Switching)
  • Andrew Isdale, CCIE #50594 (Data Center)

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!


Can You Answer Correctly? BGP Dual-omed With Different As-Path

$
0
0

R23 is configured with maximum-paths 2 and, as you can see, is in the dual-homed topology. All of the attributes are 100% identical with the exception of what you see listed in the picture below. R23 has 2 paths listed in its BGP table for all prefixes being advertised from R15 yet, only installs 1 into its RIB, why does this happen? In addition, what command can I use to fix my problem.

I know the answer but, do you? Leave your answer in the comments!

Screen Shot 2015-10-19 at 9.58.36 AM

New CCIE Collaboration Videos Have Arrived!

$
0
0

Attention all CCIE Collaboration candidates!! We’re excited to announce that Andy Vassar has been tirelessly working on new videos, and we have a brand new CCIE Lab Video on Demand playlist available!

Andy has gone through and broken down all the technologies to make sure that you have the most up to date information to help you effectively prepare for your CCIE Collaboration Lab Exam. In this playlist you’ll find 48 videos, broken down by blueprint section and technology, with the need to know information and topics covered in the lab exam.

All of this is in a high quality HD format that is clear and engaging to watch.

Stay tuned to see what other great video updates we’ll have in the coming days and weeks for our Collaboration track, as well as for our other tracks and certifications.

Make sure you swing by your Member’s Area today to check out this new playlist! We’re pretty excited about it, but don’t just take our word for it… have a look for yourself.

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 10/23/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Cliff Payne, CCIE #50659 (Data Center)
  • Evariste Happi, CCIE #46452 (Collaboration)

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

CCNA Security 210-260 IINS

$
0
0

As some of you probably already know, the CCNA Security IINS exam topics have been refreshed from version 2.0 to version 3.0. The new exam is now called CCNA 210-260 “Implementing Cisco Network Security”. We will now take a look at the differences between the two exams and highlight the most important topic changes.

First thing, IINS 3.0 topics combine and adjust the current domains. Instead of covering nine domains (IINS 2.0), only seven domains are now included. This change was made to better reflect current job roles and job tasks typically performed by CCNA Security individuals. Note that although there are fewer domains, the exam remains the same length – it lasts for 90 minutes and contains 60-70 questions. This is because some new technologies were added and certain topic areas are now covered in more depth. The exam prerequisites did not change – you will not be able to obtain a valid CCNA Security Certificate until you already possess a valid CCENT or CCNA R&S, or any CCIE certificate.

In general, the new CCNA Security exam tests the candidate’s knowledge of secure network infrastructure, understanding core security concepts, managing secure access, VPN encryption, firewalls, intrusion prevention, web/email content security, and endpoint security. This not only includes the ability to configure certain technologies, but also the abilities to install, troubleshoot, and monitor the equipment to maintain integrity, confidentiality, and availability of data and devices.

Let’s now closely examine the most important differences between the old 2.0 and new 3.0 IINS CCNA Security exam:

  • Cisco Configuration Professional (IOS GUI) is not included in IINS 3.0. Only Command Line is expected to be used for configuration (like in the CCIE Security exam).
  • It is now assumed that CCNA Security candidates already know the fundamentals of IPv6 (covered in ICND1). This means that IPv6 is not part of the IINS 3.0 blueprint.
  • Focus on ACLs has been reduced in the new exam (already covered in ICND1).
  • Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) theory (no implementation) is now covered from the perspective of FirePower solution, instead of 4200 series sensors.
  • Site-to-Site VPN configuration includes IOS – ASA examples.
  • New security topics were added: 802.1x, Identity Services Engine (ISE), Bring Your Own Device (BYOD), Cloud Web Security (CWS).
  • Certain examples and technologies were updated. For example, stronger cryptographic algorithms are used.
  • The new exam is more hands-on based.

A full list of the new CCNA Security exam topics (the blueprint) can be found here:
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/security_ccna/iins-v3/exam-topics

iPexpert’s Newest “CCIE Wall of Fame” Additions 10/30/2015

$
0
0

Please join us in congratulating the following iPexpert students who have passed their CCIE lab!

This Week’s CCIE Success Stories

  • Ehsan Emad, CCIE #28551 (Data Center)
  • Jeremy Porter, CCIE #16273 (Wireless)
  • Adrian McCaskill, CCIE #48071 (Wireless)

We Want to Hear From You!

Have you passed your CCIE lab exam and used any of iPexpert’s self-study products, or attended a CCIE Bootcamp? If so, we’d like to add you to our CCIE Wall of Fame!

Viewing all 338 articles
Browse latest View live